I was considering our assignments for the following term, which led to a train of thought that brought up some interesting questions for me concerning certain forms and presentations of satire.
I was thinking about Jonathan Swift’s ‘A Modest Proposal’, which I read long after reading Gullivers Travels as a kid. Gulliver’s Travels was a book my father used to read to me at bedtime, effectively contextualizing it for me as a children’s novel. This was the same for his favorite books to read to me, which later became part of a cherished childhood collection, including Alice in Wonderland, The Wind in the Willows, and The Wizard of Oz. Mark Twain also fell into this category for me, as a name synonymous with storybooks and funny, fantastic tales; and we’re learning he was a prolific satirist.
Upon reflection, I realized that these books all contain hidden critiques (though not so fanciful and obscure on Twain’s part) of their current society and politics, and are highly successful satires, yet are still usually considered (outside of the limited and occasionally overexuberant scholarly circle) within the context of children’s and young adult literature.
Are children’s literature and scathing social satire linked? Does satire hide behind the guise of innocuous material in order to escape being taken too seriously and giving the authors trouble? Or is satire dismissed as an amusement for the young? What seems to be the link between these two?
Barbie Doll is favorit for
Barbie Doll is favorit for some children because she is so beautiful. It is used to dress in beautiful clothes.
cubby houses
Jon Scieszka & Lane Smith
I am blessed enough to work at a children's bookstore for the past five months. IN my time there, I have discovered the works of the hilarious Jon Scieszcka and the dark Lane Smith.
If I were a child reading their texts, I would simply laugh at the silliness of it all, but as one with a more developed mind and age-agh- I find their works to be brilliant in all their humor.
Check out Jon's resume and Lane's series about the Happy Hock family.
Interesting
I find it interesting how you are thinking of Satire as being for kids when the guy in the video where the guys who made the Read A Book video are being "interviewed" said that kids don't understand Satire. He specificaly said the ages eleven and twelve. I think that kids, at least kids that old, do understand Satire, though they most likely haven't talked about it in any "scholorly" form.
I think there are different levels of complexity of satire, and this video clearly falls into a simpler level than other works. Most kids at the age of ten or older should be able to tell that this video is making fun of the other content that BET airs. The idea that kids don't understand this video and others like it is not only an ignorent one, but an offensive one.
How the Grinch Stole Christmas
Dr. Seuss’s How the Grinch Stole Christmas can be seen as another example of satire relating to capitalist culture. In the beginning of the story, all of the Whos from Whoville are preparing for the largest consumer holiday of the year. They were purchasing toys and gifts, and food for a great feast. When the trinkets and meals were lost, everyone still came together when the essence of the festival was recollected. They still were able to have a wonderful time as one big group singing together. This is commentary on the consumer-driven nature of Christmas, and how the presents and excessive spending are not the real reasons to celebrate any holiday. It was satirical in the way that the story listed a number of elaborate excesses that were being purchased around Christmas time, like the feast of roast beast, or the ridiculous amounts of presents. The Grinch, who only noticed this materialistic side of Christmas was sure that if the “Pop-guns, bicycles, roller skates, drums, checkerboards, tricycles, popcorn and plumbs,” were taken, then the Who’s Christmas would be destroyed. The values, which are diluted because of the consumer aspect of Christmas, are family and togetherness, which the Grinch found at the end of the story. Even though this satire was not sarcastic and rude, it completed the task of pointing out the extremes of Christmas time shopping, and noted that it was not the most important part of that time of year. Once the purchasing and spending facets of Christmas are removed, it is significant to say they had a better time when everyone was able to share the blessings they brought together. While this may be a somewhat obscure example of satire I think that satire can definitely be useful in this harmless way and still be relevant by teaching positive messages through very light-hearted criticism. I can remember as a child reading this book and wanting to feeling a little less concerned with the adequacy of the presents that I would receive on Christmas morning, rather than which one to open first. However, this type of satire does have the potential to be much less meaningful and subtle. I’m not sure, however, if subtlety necessarily means that the issue being satirized is not a serious matter.
Children's lit. and satire: Dr. Seuss
Excellent question, Chrystal. Here's a good example to ponder, Dr. Seuss's "The Star-Bellied Sneetches":
Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln3V0HgW4eM
Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0LgMpfLD1Y
Star-Bellied Sneetches
This is an excellent example of what I was talking about. In this story it is almost glaringly apparent that Seuss is satirizing both appearance-based classism (most often classified as racism, but I think in this case can extend to commercial-based classism, as in those with the best are better) as well as the fools they present themselves to an enterprising capitalist who takes off with all their money.
This also presents an interesting theory, because it is after their money is all spent that they cannot further modify themselves, which could be read as a calling for the removal of a capitalist based system? Was Seuss a communist cartoonist? Hmmm...
Suess
Also going with the Seuss theme, The Battle of Butter shows human nature and its love of useless fighting. It can be seen in literature like Romeo and Juliet, with the family feud that no one remembers what they are feuding for. We as humans like to prove our non-existent superiority, even if the means we are using to prove it by don’t have any actual value, things like race, or class, or what side we like the butter on our toast.